See how your site is actually put together
Most site audits give you a list. This gives you the shape: every page crawled, mapped by how it really links to the rest, with a full analysis of any page you select, plus the orphans, dead ends and broken paths a list would bury.
Your highest-value commercial pages sit four clicks deep behind a blog index, which is why they attract almost no internal links and rank below thinner competitor pages.
Why this tool exists
Almost every site has pages nobody links to, sections buried four clicks deep, and a navigation doing the work that editorial links should be doing. None of it shows up in a page-by-page report, because the problem is not in any one page. It is in the relationships between them.
Standard audits return a spreadsheet: one row per page, one column per check. That format is structurally incapable of showing you that your entire services section is orphaned, or that the only route to your highest-margin page is through a footer link. Link-map tools that do exist usually count navigation links as real links, which makes every page on a site with a mega-menu look perfectly connected.
This crawls the whole site, seeding from your sitemaps so it finds the pages nothing links to, then separates template navigation from genuine in-content links. That single distinction is what makes the map readable and the orphan detection honest: a page reachable only from the footer has hundreds of inbound links and is still, in every sense that matters, orphaned.
- A visual map of your site laid out by section and URL depth, with real link flow drawn on it
- Orphan pages, dead ends and pages no link can reach at all
- Site-wide issues grouped by type with every affected page attached
- A full analysis of any page you click, measured against the rest of your site
- A brand and SEO comparison between any page and your homepage
Who it's for
Anyone responsible for a site with more than a handful of pages.
Find the internal linking gaps that no page-level audit surfaces.
See which published pages nothing links to, usually more than expected.
Catch broken internal links, redirect chains and template-level errors at once.
Understand the shape of the site you are funding, without reading a spreadsheet.
Produce a structural audit in minutes that would take a day by hand.
Spot category pages stranded beyond the crawl depth that matters.
Trace whether the conversion path actually connects the way it was designed to.
Compare structure before and after, and catch what the migration broke.
How it works
One address in, a complete structural picture out.
Set a page budget, because the crawl runs in batches, so a large site simply takes longer
Seeded from your sitemaps, then breadth-first through real links
Bands are sections, columns are URL depth, arrows are real content links
Full analysis of that page against the site and against your homepage
Set a page budget, because the crawl runs in batches, so a large site simply takes longer
Seeded from your sitemaps, then breadth-first through real links
Bands are sections, columns are URL depth, arrows are real content links
Full analysis of that page against the site and against your homepage
Features
Built to show the structure, not to restate the page list.
Whole-site crawl
Seeds from your sitemaps and follows links breadth-first, in resumable batches, so a three-hundred-page site is mapped completely rather than sampled.
Content links separated from navigation
Template links are counted and drawn separately. Without that split, every page on a site with a mega-menu looks perfectly connected and the real structure is invisible.
Honest orphan detection
A page linked only from the footer is flagged as orphaned, because that is what a search engine effectively treats it as. Most tools miss this entirely.
True click depth
Recomputed over content links, so 'three clicks deep' means three real clicks, not 'the nav links to it, so everything is depth one'.
Site-wide issue list
One row per issue type with every affected page attached, ordered by severity. Click any page to jump straight to it in the map.
Per-page analysis on click
Link position, technical SEO, content quality and brand consistency, each measured against your site's own baseline rather than a universal target.
What you'll get
A structural picture and everything needed to act on it.
Your whole site laid out by section and depth, with real link flow drawn on it.
Errors, warnings and notices across crawlability, indexing, content and structure.
The pages nothing links to, and the pages that link nowhere.
How each page stands relative to the rest of your site.
Brand and SEO parity between any page and your homepage.
Every page, every metric and every issue, ready for a spreadsheet.
See it in action
PreviewA preview of the kind of map the analyzer builds. Run it on any address to see your own.
Your highest-value commercial pages sit four clicks deep behind a blog index, which is why they attract almost no internal links and rank below thinner competitor pages.
Why the shape matters
An orphaned section is obvious in a diagram and invisible in a spreadsheet, because the problem is a relationship rather than a property.
They cost nothing, take minutes, and are the one ranking factor entirely within your control. Most sites simply never look at them.
Click depth tells search engines what you consider important. Most sites have never checked what theirs actually says.
A diagram gets a decision out of a meeting in a way a 300-row export never does.
Use cases
Where a structural view changes what you do next.
Hundreds of published articles, and traffic concentrated in a handful of them.
Map the site and filter to orphans and dead ends.
Usually a large body of work nothing links to. Linking it into the relevant hubs is a week of work against content already paid for.
A redesign shipped and rankings moved unpredictably.
Crawl the new site and look at broken pages, redirect chains and depth changes.
A concrete list of what the migration broke, rather than a theory about it.
Some categories rank and others never have.
Compare depth and in-content inbound links across category pages.
The underperforming ones are almost always deeper and less linked, which is a structural cause with a structural fix.
You need to understand a site you did not build, quickly.
Run the crawl and read the map before the kickoff call.
A structural brief in ten minutes, and two or three findings the client did not know about.
How the analysis works
The crawl seeds from your sitemaps first and then follows links breadth-first. That order matters: a link-only crawl mirrors whatever your navigation happens to expose and systematically misses the pages nothing links to, which are exactly the pages this tool exists to find.
Every link is then classified as either template chrome or genuine in-content. A site-wide mega-menu makes every page link to the same dozen targets, so counting them equally turns a link graph into a nearly complete graph, with hundreds of pages producing tens of thousands of identical edges, none of which say anything about how the site is actually organised. Orphan and dead-end detection here counts only content links, which is why its answers differ from tools that do not make the distinction.
Click depth is recomputed over content links rather than taken from the crawl order, so a page the navigation happens to expose is not recorded as one click from home when no editorial path reaches it. Per-page findings are then expressed against your site's own baseline, so a 400-word page is thin where the median is 1,200 and substantial where the median is 300, and a fixed threshold would call both the same thing.
The unit of analysis is the relationship between pages, not the page. That is the whole reason a diagram earns its place here.
Every page-level judgement is made against the rest of your site, so the findings hold whether you have twelve pages or eight hundred.
Every number comes from a page that was actually fetched and parsed. Where the crawl could not reach something, it says so rather than estimating.
Frequently asked questions
Related resources
The tools that pair with a structural view.
Look at the shape before you optimise the pages
Most sites have a structural problem they have never seen, because nothing they use is capable of showing it. Ten minutes and an address is all this takes.